Over 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 wins (3,71 s vs 7,45 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX M60 I20 | MONA M03 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s−3,74 s | 7,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s−3,54 s | 15,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s−5,66 s | 27,51 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+50 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,26 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,60 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX M60 I20 | MONA M03 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 2,16 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 3,61 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 5,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s | 7,45 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,03 s | 9,58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,60 s | 16,40 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,69 s | 27,72 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s | 15,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s | 27,51 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 581 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the iX M60 hits 100 km/h in 3.72 s versus 7.45 s for the MONA M03. At this point, the iX M60 leads by 3.74 s and sits roughly 31 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the iX M60 is doing 151 km/h against 126 km/h for the MONA M03. The gap is 2.70 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the iX M60 crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 15.48 s. The 3.54 s gap represents roughly 144 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the iX M60 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX M60 finishes in 21.84 s versus 27.51 s, with a 5.66 s lead.
The iX M60 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the MONA M03’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX M60 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the MONA M03 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.26 kg/hp vs 7.60 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.92 seconds. The 3.74 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 wins (3,71 s vs 7,45 s).
iX M60 I20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,71 seconds (calibrated simulation).
iX M60 I20: 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp. MONA M03: 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp.
iX M60 I20: 250 km/h. MONA M03: 200 km/h.