Sur 0–100 km/h, Urus SE gagne (3,46 s vs 3,71 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Urus SE | iX M60 I20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,46 s−0,26 s | 3,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,30 s−0,64 s | 11,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,49 s−1,36 s | 21,85 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 312 km/h+62 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,29 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,26 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Urus SE | iX M60 I20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,01 s | 0,93 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,69 s | 1,54 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,66 s | 2,67 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,46 s | 3,71 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,42 s | 5,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,00 s | 8,60 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,75 s | 13,69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,30 s | 11,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,49 s | 21,85 s |
| Top speed limited | 312 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 653 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 900 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 150 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Urus SE | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed torque-converter automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
Off the line, the Urus SE hits 100 km/h in 3.46 s versus 3.72 s for the iX M60. Despite the faster sprint time, the iX M60 is 1 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Urus SE is doing 166 km/h against 151 km/h for the iX M60. The gap is 0.28 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Urus SE crosses the line in 11.30 s versus 11.94 s. The 0.64 s gap represents roughly 33 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Urus SE continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 229 km/h versus 212 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Urus SE finishes in 20.49 s versus 21.84 s, with a 1.35 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Urus SE is capped at 312 km/h, the iX M60 at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.29 kg/hp vs 4.26 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.80 seconds. The 0.26 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Urus SE gagne (3,46 s vs 3,71 s).
Urus SE passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,46 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Urus SE : 653 hp, ratio 3,29 kg/hp. iX M60 I20 : 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp.
Urus SE : 312 km/h. iX M60 I20 : 250 km/h.