Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F22 gagne (4,51 s vs 4,54 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M140i F20LCI | M240i F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,54 s | 4,51 s+0,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,60 s | 12,59 s+0,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,65 s | 22,59 s+0,06 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,32 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,38 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M140i F20LCI | M240i F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,37 s | 1,42 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,25 s | 2,29 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,51 s | 3,51 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,54 s | 4,51 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,82 s | 5,79 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,32 s | 9,24 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,54 s | 14,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,60 s | 12,59 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,65 s | 22,59 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 470 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M140i | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 490 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M240i | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw M240i hits 100 km/h in 4.52 s versus 4.54 s for the Bmw M140i. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M140i is doing 151 km/h against 151 km/h for the Bmw M240i. The gap is 0.01 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M240i crosses the line in 12.59 s versus 12.60 s. The 0.01 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory — both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.06 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere — range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M140i and the Bmw M240i are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.32 kg/hp vs 4.38 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.56 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F22 gagne (4,51 s vs 4,54 s).
M140i F20LCI passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,54 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M140i F20LCI : 340 hp, ratio 4,32 kg/hp. M240i F22 : 340 hp, ratio 4,38 kg/hp.
M140i F20LCI : 250 km/h. M240i F22 : 250 km/h.