BMW M240i

PetrolcompactGENERATION F22, 2018

340 hp, 4,6 s 0-100 : among the 16 compacts 2016–2020, the M240i ranks 4th of 16 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 16 in Top speed, 4th of 16 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
340 hp
500 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.6 s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
7.4 L
/100 km
Tank
52 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
6 cyl.
Displacement
2,998 cm³
Power
340 hp
Couple
500 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
7.4 L/100 km
Tank
52 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
4,6 s
VMax
250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,454 mm
Wheelbase
2,690 mm
Width
1,774 mm
Height
1,408 mm
Boot
390 L
Kerb weight
1,490 kg
Cd
0.33
CO₂ WLTP
169 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 16 compacts, the M240i ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 4th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s), 5th of 16 in Top speed (250 km/h), 4th of 16 in Power-to-weight (228 hp/t). 4th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s), 5th of 16 in Top speed (250 km/h), 4th of 16 in Power-to-weight (228 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 7,4 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M140i xDrive (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300 (1st with 260 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.6 s 0-100 (4th of 16 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the M240i ranks 4th of 16 in 0–100 km/h, 0.2 s off the reference BMW M140i xDrive (4.4 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (5th of 16 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 260 km/h.

Where the M240i stands against compacts

Comparison across 16 compacts marketed between 2016–2020.
0–100 km/h4e / 16
4,6 s
Min 5,4 s · Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy-RMax 4,4 s · BMW M140i xDrive
Top speed5e / 16
250 km/h
Min 250 km/h · BMW M2 CompetitionMax 260 km/h · Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300
Power-to-weight4e / 16
228 hp/t
Min 195 hp/t · BMW M235i xDriveMax 265 hp/t · BMW M2 Competition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Popular duels involving the M240i

Continue with the BMW M240i

The same car, from other angles.

BMW M240i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the M240i rank in its segment?

Among the 16 compacts 2016–2020, the M240i ranks 4th of 16 in 0–100 km/h (4.6 s, behind the BMW M140i xDrive), 5th of 16 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Renault Megane 4 RS Trophy 300), 4th of 16 in Power-to-weight (228 hp/t, behind the BMW M2 Competition).

How much does the M240i cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a BMW M140i xDrive instead?

The BMW M140i xDrive leads in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s vs 4.6 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M240i vs BMW M140i xDrive duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.