Sur 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 gagne (4,12 s vs 4,46 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M2 G87 | 718 Cayman GTS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,12 s−0,35 s | 4,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s−0,24 s | 12,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,81 s−0,16 s | 21,97 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h | 290 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,77 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M2 G87 | 718 Cayman GTS |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,17 s | 1,21 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,95 s | 2,02 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,06 s | 3,52 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,12 s | 4,46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,26 s | 5,50 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,46 s | 8,63 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,14 s | 13,06 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 12,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,81 s | 21,97 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h | 290 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 365 hp | B4 |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 375 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | MANUAL |
Off the line, the M2 hits 100 km/h in 4.12 s versus 4.47 s for the 718 Cayman GTS. At this point, the M2 leads by 0.35 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M2 is doing 155 km/h against 155 km/h for the 718 Cayman GTS. The gap is 0.23 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the M2 crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 12.32 s. The 0.24 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The M2 maxes out at 285 km/h while the 718 Cayman GTS keeps accelerating towards 290 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.20 s.
At 1,000 metres, the M2 finishes in 21.80 s versus 21.96 s, with just 0.16 s to spare. The 718 Cayman GTS fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the M2 is capped at 285 km/h, the 718 Cayman GTS at 290 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.76 kg/hp vs 3.77 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.41 seconds. The 0.35 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 gagne (4,12 s vs 4,46 s).
M2 G87 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,12 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M2 G87 : 460 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp. 718 Cayman GTS : 365 hp, ratio 3,77 kg/hp.
M2 G87 : 285 km/h. 718 Cayman GTS : 290 km/h.