Among the 10 compacts 2021–2025, the M2 ranks 1st of 10 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the BMW M2), 1st of 10 in Top speed (285 km/h, behind the BMW M2), 1st of 10 in Power-to-weight (266 hp/t, behind the BMW M2).
G87 · GENERATION 2023 → · COMPACT
BMWICE
M2
460 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 10 compacts 2021–2025, the M2 ranks 1st of 10 in 0–100 km/h, 1st of 10 in Top speed, 1st of 10 in Power-to-weight, behind the only BMW M2. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
460hp
550 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.1s
VMax 285 km/h
Cons.
10.0L
/100 km
Tank
52L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW M2
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 2,993 cm³ |
| Power | 460 hp |
| Couple | 550 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 52 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,1 s |
| VMax | 285 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,581 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,747 mm |
| Width | 1,887 mm |
| Height | 1,403 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,730 kg |
| Cd | 0.33 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 227 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 10 compacts, the M2 ranks (best in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 1st of 10 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 1st of 10 in Top speed (285 km/h), 1st of 10 in Power-to-weight (266 hp/t). 1st of 10 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 1st of 10 in Top speed (285 km/h), 1st of 10 in Power-to-weight (266 hp/t).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,0 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
No alternative dominates across all segment dimensions.
Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (1st of 10 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the M2 ranks 1st of 10 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference BMW M2 (4.1 s).
Top speed: 285 km/h (1st of 10 in Top speed)
Top speed of 285 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the M2 stands against compacts
Comparison across 10 compacts marketed between 2021–2025.
0–100 km/h1e / 10
4,1 s
Min 5,6 s · Volkswagen Golf 8 GTI ClubsportMax 4,1 s · BMW M2
Top speed1e / 10
285 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Toyota GR Corolla Circuit EditionMax 285 km/h · BMW M2
Power-to-weight1e / 10
266 hp/t
Min 195 hp/t · Bmw M235i xDrive Gran CoupeMax 266 hp/t · BMW M2
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
RS 3 Sedan400 hp · 0-100 3.8 s
RS 3 Sportback400 hp · 0-100 3.8 s
S3 Sedan333 hp · 0-100 4.7 s
S3 Sportback333 hp · 0-100 4.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the M2
Frequently asked questions
BMW M2: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.