Sur 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 gagne (4,12 s vs 8,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M2 G87 | XC40 B4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,12 s−4,12 s | 8,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s−4,03 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,81 s−7,58 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h+105 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,17 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M2 G87 | XC40 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,17 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,95 s | 3,12 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,06 s | 5,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,12 s | 8,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,26 s | 11,35 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,46 s | 21,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,14 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,81 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
Off the line, the M2 hits 100 km/h in 4.12 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. At this point, the M2 leads by 4.12 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M2 is doing 155 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 2.56 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the M2 crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 16.10 s. The 4.02 s gap represents roughly 149 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the M2 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M2 finishes in 21.80 s versus 29.39 s, with a 7.58 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the M2 is capped at 285 km/h, the XC40 B4 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.76 kg/hp vs 8.17 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 4.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 gagne (4,12 s vs 8,23 s).
M2 G87 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,12 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M2 G87 : 460 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp. XC40 B4 : 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp.
M2 G87 : 285 km/h. XC40 B4 : 180 km/h.