Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F44 gagne (4,67 s vs 4,87 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| S 580 e 4MATIC W223 | M240i F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,87 s | 4,67 s+0,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,96 s | 12,78 s+0,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,11 s | 23,04 s+0,07 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,84 kg/hp | 4,49 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | S 580 e 4MATIC W223 | M240i F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,33 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,17 s | 2,21 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,58 s | 3,53 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,87 s | 4,67 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,33 s | 6,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,27 s | 9,80 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,71 s | 15,53 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,96 s | 12,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,11 s | 23,04 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 470 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M240i | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw M240i hits 100 km/h in 4.67 s versus 4.87 s for the S 580 e 4MATIC. Despite lacking instant torque, 340 hp of power compensates. The 0.21 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M240i is doing 147 km/h against 144 km/h for the S 580 e 4MATIC. The gap is 0.11 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M240i crosses the line in 12.78 s versus 12.95 s. The 0.18 s gap represents roughly 9 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M240i finishes in 23.03 s versus 23.10 s, with just 0.07 s to spare. The S 580 e 4MATIC fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the S 580 e 4MATIC and the Bmw M240i are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.15 seconds. The 0.21 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F44 gagne (4,67 s vs 4,87 s).
S 580 e 4MATIC W223 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,87 secondes (simulation calibrée).
S 580 e 4MATIC W223 : 510 hp, ratio 4,84 kg/hp. M240i F44 : 340 hp, ratio 4,49 kg/hp.
S 580 e 4MATIC W223 : 250 km/h. M240i F44 : 250 km/h.