Over 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 wins (4,19 s vs 6,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 G82 | 320d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s−2,64 s | 6,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s−2,73 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s−5,74 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+10 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,11 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 G82 | 320d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,22 s | 1,25 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,31 s | 4,65 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s | 6,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,52 s | 9,65 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,63 s | 17,86 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,02 s | 32,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 hits 100 km/h in 4.19 s versus 6.83 s for the Bmw 320d. At this point, the Bmw M4 leads by 2.64 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 is doing 155 km/h against 120 km/h for the Bmw 320d. The gap is 1.49 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 crosses the line in 12.23 s versus 14.95 s. The 2.73 s gap represents roughly 107 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 219 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 finishes in 21.86 s versus 27.60 s, with a 5.74 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M4 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 320d at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.54 kg/hp vs 8.11 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.30 seconds. The 2.64 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 G82 wins (4,19 s vs 6,83 s).
M4 G82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,19 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 G82: 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. 320d G20: 190 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp.
M4 G82: 250 km/h. 320d G20: 240 km/h.