Performance duelHome › Duel

Porsche Cayenne Turbo S 958.1 vs Bmw M4 G82 : which one is faster?

0-100 km/h, 400 m, 1000 m, top speed — physics simulation calibrated on 7 measures.

VMax
0-100
310
0 – 100 km/h
4.36s
0.17 s
M4
4.19s
400 m standing start
12.42s
0.19 s
M4
12.23s
Top speed
279
29 km/h
Cayenne
250
Power570 ch
Power480 ch
Torque800 Nm
Torque550 Nm
Weight2 170 kg
Weight1 700 kg
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
DrivetrainM4
GearboxAutomatic · Tiptro…
GearboxManual · 6 sp.
VMax
Porsche
Cayenne Turbo S 958.1
2014
4,36 s
279 km/h
Power570 ch
Torque800 Nm
Weight2 170 kg
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
Faster
BMW
M4 G82
2024
4,19 s
250 km/h
Power480 ch
Torque550 Nm
Weight1 700 kg
DrivetrainM4
Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
2014 · PETROL · 570 ch
Bmw M4
2024 · PETROL · 480 ch
0-30 km/h1,27 s
0-50 km/h2,12 s
0-80 km/h3,37 s
0-100 km/h4,36 s
0-120 km/h5,67 s
0-160 km/h9,04 s
0-200 km/h14,24 s
400 m DA12,42 s
1 000 m DA22,42 s
VMax279 km/h
0-30 km/h1,22 s
0-50 km/h2,04 s
0-80 km/h3,31 s
0-100 km/h4,19 s
0-120 km/h5,52 s
0-160 km/h8,63 s
0-200 km/h13,02 s
400 m DA12,23 s
1 000 m DA21,86 s
VMax250 km/h
DQM95%
Cayenne Turbo S
--
M4
--

Simulation de performance

Race simulation at real speed

CONFIDENCE 95%
400 m result
12.23s
Bmw M4
Gap
0.19s
Distance
400 m
Dist.
Cayenne Turbo
Gap
Bmw M4
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
100 m
5.60 s
119 km/h
~3 m
½ long.
5.52 s
120 km/h
200 m
8.23 s
152 km/h
~5 m
1 long.
8.12 s
155 km/h
400 m
12.42 s
189 km/h
~10 m
2 long.
12.23 s
194 km/h
600 m
16.02 s
211 km/h
~18 m
4 long.
15.71 s
219 km/h
1,000 m
22.41 s
236 km/h
~37 m
8 long.
21.86 s
248 km/h

Calibrated physics simulation: SCx via VMax, power curves, Crr via WLTP, drivetrain losses. Manufacturer 0-100 is the calibration target. Confidence 95 %.

400 m
RACE MODE

Upcoming offersExclusive

Receive personalized offers

Pour recevoir les meilleures offres près de chez vous



Cayenne Turbo S vs Bmw M4: chronicle of a drag race at 279 km/h

The launch: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Bmw M4 hits 100 km/h in 4.19 s versus 4.36 s for the Cayenne Turbo S. At this point, the Bmw M4 leads by 0.17 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 is doing 155 km/h against 152 km/h for the Cayenne Turbo S. The gap is 0.11 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 crosses the line in 12.23 s versus 12.42 s. The 0.19 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track — two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 219 km/h versus 211 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 finishes in 21.86 s versus 22.41 s, with a 0.56 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (279 km/h), the Cayenne Turbo S never recovers its launch deficit.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne Turbo S is capped at 282 km/h, the Bmw M4 at 250 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.81 kg/hp vs 3.54 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.36 seconds. The 0.17 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Bmw M4 is slightly faster than the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S to 100 km/h. The edge holds on standing starts but may narrow at higher speeds depending on aerodynamic load.

Données de performance issues de simulations physiques calibrées (moteur Apex). Consommation basée sur les données WLTP constructeur. Les performances réelles peuvent varier selon les conditions d'utilisation.

Prix énergie indicatifs : essence 1,85€/L, diesel 1,75€/L, électricité 0,25€/kWh (tarif domestique). Calculs basés sur 20 000 km/an.

Caralogy est un service indépendant de comparaison. Les données affichées sont fournies à titre informatif et ne constituent pas une offre commerciale.