Among the 17 E-SUV 2012–2016, the Cayenne Turbo S ranks 4th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 3rd of 17 in Top speed (282 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 1st of 17 in Power-to-weight (263 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).
Cayenne Turbo S
570 hp, 4,4 s 0-100 : among the 17 E-SUV 2012–2016, the Cayenne Turbo S ranks 4th of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 3rd of 17 in Top speed, 1st of 17 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo S. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
570hp
800 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.4s
VMax 282 km/h
Cons.
13.8L
/100 km
Tank
99.934824L
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 4,806 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 558 hp |
| Combined power | 570 hp |
| Combined torque | 800 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 13.8 L/100km |
| Tank | 99.934824 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,4 s |
| VMax | 282 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,846 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,896 mm |
| Width | 1,938 mm |
| Height | 1,702 mm |
| Boot | 60 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,170 kg |
| Cd | 0.36 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 17 E-SUV, the Cayenne Turbo S ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 4th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s), 3rd of 17 in Top speed (282 km/h), 1st of 17 in Power-to-weight (263 hp/t). 4th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s), 3rd of 17 in Top speed (282 km/h), 1st of 17 in Power-to-weight (263 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 3.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 283 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.4 s 0-100 (4th of 17 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne Turbo S ranks 4th of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 0.5 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (3.9 s).
Top speed: 282 km/h (3rd of 17 in Top speed)
Top speed of 282 km/h. The segment reference reaches 283 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Cayenne Turbo S stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 17 E-SUV marketed between 2012–2016.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Cayenne Turbo S
Porsche Cayenne Turbo S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s vs 4.4 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne Turbo S vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.