Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 wins (3,83 s vs 6,89 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 Competition F82 | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s−3,06 s | 6,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,61 s−3,39 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,89 s−6,83 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+24 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,38 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,44 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 Competition F82 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,31 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,97 s | 4,66 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 6,89 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,79 s | 9,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,46 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,33 s | 33,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,61 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,89 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 725 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 6.89 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the Bmw M4 Competition leads by 3.06 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition is doing 163 km/h against 119 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 1.93 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 Competition crosses the line in 11.61 s versus 15.00 s. The 3.39 s gap represents roughly 131 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 165 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition finishes in 20.89 s versus 27.71 s, with a 6.83 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M4 Competition is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.38 kg/hp vs 9.44 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.45 seconds. The 3.06 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 wins (3,83 s vs 6,89 s).
M4 Competition F82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 Competition F82: 510 hp, ratio 3,38 kg/hp. Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp.
M4 Competition F82: 250 km/h. Q7 SUV: 226 km/h.