Over 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 wins (3,44 s vs 4,67 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M5 F90 | M240i F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,44 s−1,23 s | 4,67 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,16 s−1,62 s | 12,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,22 s−2,82 s | 23,04 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,11 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,49 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M5 F90 | M240i F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,01 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,68 s | 2,21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,64 s | 3,53 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,44 s | 4,67 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,34 s | 6,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,74 s | 9,80 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,14 s | 15,53 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,16 s | 12,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,22 s | 23,04 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 865 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw M5 hits 100 km/h in 3.44 s versus 4.67 s for the Bmw M240i. At this point, the Bmw M5 leads by 1.23 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M5 is doing 168 km/h against 147 km/h for the Bmw M240i. The gap is 1.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M5 crosses the line in 11.16 s versus 12.78 s. The 1.62 s gap represents roughly 80 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M5 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 235 km/h versus 205 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M5 finishes in 20.22 s versus 23.03 s, with a 2.81 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M5 and the Bmw M240i are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.11 kg/hp vs 4.49 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.84 seconds. The 1.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 wins (3,44 s vs 4,67 s).
M5 F90 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,44 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M5 F90: 600 hp, ratio 3,11 kg/hp. M240i F44: 340 hp, ratio 4,49 kg/hp.
M5 F90: 250 km/h. M240i F44: 250 km/h.