Over 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 wins (3,42 s vs 6,89 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | M5 F90 | Q7 SUV | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.42 s | 6.89 s | 3.46 s · M5 F90 |
| 400 m standing start | 11.25 s | 15.00 s | 3.75 s · M5 F90 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.43 s | 27.72 s | 7.29 s · M5 F90 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 226 km/h | 24 km/h · M5 F90 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.16 kg/hp | 9.44 kg/hp | better ratio · M5 F90 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | M5 F90 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0.97 s | 1.30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.62 s | 2.31 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.56 s | 4.66 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.42 s | 6.89 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4.38 s | 9.75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7.00 s | 18.12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10.73 s | 33.89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11.25 s | 15.00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.43 s | 27.72 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 226 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the M5 hits 100 km/h in 3.43 s versus 6.89 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the M5 leads by 3.47 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M5 is doing 165 km/h against 119 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 2.25 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the M5 crosses the line in 11.25 s versus 15.00 s. The 3.75 s gap represents roughly 144 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the M5 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 165 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M5 finishes in 20.43 s versus 27.71 s, with a 7.29 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the M5 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 9.44 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.45 seconds. The 3.47 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 wins (3,42 s vs 6,89 s).
M5 F90 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M5 F90: 600 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp.
M5 F90: 250 km/h. Q7 SUV: 226 km/h.