Sur 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E GT gagne (3,73 s vs 7,22 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Mustang Mach-E GT | X1 xDrive20i F48 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s−3,49 s | 7,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,00 s−3,24 s | 15,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,87 s−5,18 s | 28,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 223 km/h−23 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,33 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,88 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Mustang Mach-E GT | X1 xDrive20i F48 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,02 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,70 s | 2,47 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,78 s | 4,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s | 7,22 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,94 s | 10,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,62 s | 18,68 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,27 s | 35,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,00 s | 15,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,87 s | 28,05 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 860 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 108 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 580 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E GT hits 100 km/h in 3.73 s versus 7.22 s for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. The instant torque of 860 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Mustang Mach-E GT leads by 3.49 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT is doing 152 km/h against 118 km/h for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. The gap is 2.06 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E GT crosses the line in 11.99 s versus 15.24 s. The 3.24 s gap represents roughly 125 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 200 km/h versus 164 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT finishes in 22.87 s versus 28.05 s, with a 5.18 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (223 km/h), the Bmw X1 xDrive20i never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Mustang Mach-E GT is capped at 200 km/h, the Bmw X1 xDrive20i at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.89 seconds. The 3.49 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E GT gagne (3,73 s vs 7,22 s).
Mustang Mach-E GT passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,73 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Mustang Mach-E GT : 487 hp, ratio 4,33 kg/hp. X1 xDrive20i F48 : 178 hp, ratio 8,88 kg/hp.
Mustang Mach-E GT : 200 km/h. X1 xDrive20i F48 : 223 km/h.