Sur 0–100 km/h, Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD gagne (6,09 s vs 7,22 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD | X1 xDrive20i F48 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,09 s−1,13 s | 7,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,32 s−0,92 s | 15,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,94 s−2,11 s | 28,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+17 km/h | 223 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,10 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,88 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD | X1 xDrive20i F48 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,63 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,78 s | 2,47 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,52 s | 4,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,09 s | 7,22 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,16 s | 10,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,94 s | 18,68 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 24,26 s | 35,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,32 s | 15,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,94 s | 28,05 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 860 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 580 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD hits 100 km/h in 6.09 s versus 7.22 s for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. The instant torque of 520 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 1.13 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD is doing 131 km/h against 118 km/h for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. The gap is 0.37 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD crosses the line in 14.32 s versus 15.24 s. The 0.92 s gap represents roughly 37 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 181 km/h versus 164 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD finishes in 25.93 s versus 28.05 s, with a 2.12 s lead.
Electronically capped at 223 km/h, the Bmw X1 xDrive20i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.89 seconds. The 1.13 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD gagne (6,09 s vs 7,22 s).
Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,09 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD : 305 hp, ratio 6,10 kg/hp. X1 xDrive20i F48 : 178 hp, ratio 8,88 kg/hp.
Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD : 240 km/h. X1 xDrive20i F48 : 223 km/h.