Sur 0–100 km/h, X1 xDrive25e F48 gagne (6,84 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X1 xDrive25e F48 | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,84 s−1,51 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,99 s−1,20 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,59 s−1,82 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 215 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,93 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X1 xDrive25e F48 | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,45 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,49 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,75 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,84 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,57 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,61 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,99 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,59 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 193 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e hits 100 km/h in 6.84 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. The instant torque of 385 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e leads by 1.51 s and sits roughly 20 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e is doing 121 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.93 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e crosses the line in 14.99 s versus 16.19 s. The 1.20 s gap represents roughly 47 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 167 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X1 xDrive25e finishes in 27.59 s versus 29.41 s, with a 1.82 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (215 km/h), the E-PACE P200 never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X1 xDrive25e is capped at 193 km/h, the E-PACE P200 at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 1.51 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X1 xDrive25e F48 gagne (6,84 s vs 8,35 s).
X1 xDrive25e F48 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,84 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X1 xDrive25e F48 : 220 hp, ratio 7,93 kg/hp. E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
X1 xDrive25e F48 : 193 km/h. E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h.