Sur 0–100 km/h, X2 xDrive20i F39 gagne (7,84 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E-PACE P200 | X2 xDrive20i F39 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 7,84 s+0,51 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,73 s+0,46 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 28,75 s+0,66 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h | 221 km/h−6 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,74 kg/hp | 8,02 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E-PACE P200 | X2 xDrive20i F39 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,66 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,33 s | 2,90 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,88 s | 5,48 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 7,84 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,44 s | 10,89 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,17 s | 19,94 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,14 s | 40,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,73 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 28,75 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 221 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | E-PACE P200 2018 | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | X2 xDrive20i | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X2 xDrive20i hits 100 km/h in 7.84 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Bmw X2 xDrive20i leads by 0.51 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X2 xDrive20i is doing 116 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.39 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X2 xDrive20i crosses the line in 15.73 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.46 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X2 xDrive20i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 162 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X2 xDrive20i finishes in 28.74 s versus 29.41 s, with a 0.67 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (215 vs 221 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the Bmw X2 xDrive20i at 224 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 8.02 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 0.51 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X2 xDrive20i F39 gagne (7,84 s vs 8,35 s).
E-PACE P200 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. X2 xDrive20i F39 : 192 hp, ratio 8,02 kg/hp.
E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h. X2 xDrive20i F39 : 221 km/h.