Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,74 s vs 4,96 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 M40i G01 | Formentor VZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,74 s−0,22 s | 4,96 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,98 s−0,28 s | 13,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s−0,34 s | 23,96 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,19 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,43 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 M40i G01 | Formentor VZ |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,56 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,08 s | 2,31 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,49 s | 3,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,74 s | 4,96 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,30 s | 6,62 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,59 s | 11,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,32 s | 17,73 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,98 s | 13,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s | 23,96 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 870 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
Off the line, the X3 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.74 s versus 4.96 s for the Formentor VZ. At this point, the X3 M40i leads by 0.22 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X3 M40i is doing 142 km/h against 142 km/h for the Formentor VZ. The gap is 0.24 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the X3 M40i crosses the line in 12.98 s versus 13.25 s. The 0.28 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the X3 M40i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X3 M40i finishes in 23.62 s versus 23.95 s, with a 0.33 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the X3 M40i and the Formentor VZ are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.19 kg/hp vs 5.43 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.51 seconds. The 0.22 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,74 s vs 4,96 s).
X3 M40i G01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,74 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X3 M40i G01: 360 hp, ratio 5,19 kg/hp. Formentor VZ: 300 hp, ratio 5,43 kg/hp.
X3 M40i G01: 250 km/h. Formentor VZ: 250 km/h.