Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,74 s vs 7,11 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 M40i G01 | Cayenne (6-speed manual) 958.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,74 s−2,38 s | 7,11 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,98 s−2,13 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s−3,63 s | 27,25 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+20 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,19 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 M40i G01 | Cayenne (6-speed manual) 958.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,69 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,08 s | 3,08 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,49 s | 5,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,74 s | 7,11 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,30 s | 9,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,59 s | 16,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,32 s | 29,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,98 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s | 27,25 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 870 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 304 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the X3 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.74 s versus 7.11 s for the Cayenne (6-speed manual). At this point, the X3 M40i leads by 2.38 s and sits roughly 20 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X3 M40i is doing 142 km/h against 125 km/h for the Cayenne (6-speed manual). The gap is 1.45 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X3 M40i crosses the line in 12.98 s versus 15.11 s. The 2.13 s gap represents roughly 88 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X3 M40i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X3 M40i finishes in 23.62 s versus 27.24 s, with a 3.62 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X3 M40i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne (6-speed manual) at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.19 kg/hp vs 6.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.93 seconds. The 2.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,74 s vs 7,11 s).
X3 M40i G01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,74 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X3 M40i G01: 360 hp, ratio 5,19 kg/hp. Cayenne (6-speed manual) 958.1: 304 hp, ratio 6,56 kg/hp.
X3 M40i G01: 250 km/h. Cayenne (6-speed manual) 958.1: 230 km/h.