Over 0–100 km/h, X3 xDrive30i G01 wins (6,35 s vs 6,96 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 xDrive30i G01 | 320d xDrive G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,35 s−0,61 s | 6,96 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,57 s−0,49 s | 15,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,56 s−1,27 s | 27,83 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+7 km/h | 233 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,53 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 xDrive30i G01 | 320d xDrive G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,50 s | 1,26 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,54 s | 2,29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,56 s | 4,73 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,35 s | 6,96 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,65 s | 9,86 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,25 s | 18,39 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,16 s | 34,42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,57 s | 15,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,56 s | 27,83 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 233 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 620 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw X3 xDrive30i hits 100 km/h in 6.35 s versus 6.96 s for the Bmw 320d xDrive. The 0.61 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X3 xDrive30i is doing 126 km/h against 119 km/h for the Bmw 320d xDrive. The gap is 0.16 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X3 xDrive30i crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 15.06 s. The 0.49 s gap represents roughly 20 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X3 xDrive30i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 165 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X3 xDrive30i finishes in 26.56 s versus 27.83 s, with a 1.27 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (240 vs 233 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X3 xDrive30i is capped at 240 km/h, the Bmw 320d xDrive at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.81 kg/hp vs 8.53 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.56 seconds. The 0.61 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X3 xDrive30i G01 wins (6,35 s vs 6,96 s).
X3 xDrive30i G01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X3 xDrive30i G01: 252 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. 320d xDrive G20: 190 hp, ratio 8,53 kg/hp.
X3 xDrive30i G01: 240 km/h. 320d xDrive G20: 233 km/h.