Among the 22 saloons hybrid 2018–2022, the 320d xDrive ranks 4th of 22 in Combined consumption (4.4 L/100, behind the Bmw 320d), 16th of 21 in Tank range (909 km, behind the Bmw 318d Steptronic), 17th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.9 s, behind the Bmw M340i xDrive).
320d xDrive
190 hp, 6,9 s 0-100 : among the 22 saloons hybrid 2018–2022, the 320d xDrive ranks 4th of 22 in Combined consumption, 16th of 21 in Tank range, 17th of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
190hp
400 Nm · 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.9s
VMax 233 km/h
Cons.
4.4L
/100 km
Tank
40L
Full specifications BMW 320d xDrive
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 11 hp |
| Combined power | 190 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,9 s |
| VMax | 233 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,709 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,851 mm |
| Width | 1,827 mm |
| Height | 1,445 mm |
| Boot | 480 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,620 kg |
| Cd | 0.25 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 117 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 saloons hybrid, the 320d xDrive ranks (top 4 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 4th of 22 in Combined consumption (4.4 L/100).
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 320d (1st with 4.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 318d Steptronic (1st with 1439 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.4 L/100 L/100 (4th of 22 in Combined consumption)
The 320d xDrive consumes 4.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 320d (4.1 L/100).
Tank range: 909 km (16th of 21 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 320d xDrive covers 909 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1439 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 320d xDrive stands against saloons hybrid
Comparison across 22 saloons hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 3 Series G20 range
Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G20
Popular duels involving the 320d xDrive
BMW 320d xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
909 km on a full tank (4.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 16th of 21 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 4.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320d xDrive vs Bmw 320d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.