Over 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 wins (4,81 s vs 6,21 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X4 M40d G02 | John Cooper Works FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,81 s−1,40 s | 6,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,15 s−1,11 s | 14,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,10 s−1,20 s | 25,30 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 251 km/h−1 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,94 kg/hp | 5,09 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X4 M40d G02 | John Cooper Works FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,19 s | 1,85 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,93 s | 3,09 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,42 s | 4,95 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,81 s | 6,21 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,55 s | 7,93 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,38 s | 12,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,97 s | 20,51 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,15 s | 14,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,10 s | 25,30 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 251 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 020 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 175 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw X4 M40d hits 100 km/h in 4.81 s versus 6.21 s for the John Cooper Works FWD. At this point, the Bmw X4 M40d leads by 1.40 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d is doing 138 km/h against 137 km/h for the John Cooper Works FWD. The gap is 1.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X4 M40d crosses the line in 13.14 s versus 14.26 s. The 1.12 s gap represents roughly 52 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 192 km/h versus 191 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d finishes in 24.09 s versus 25.29 s, with a 1.20 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 251 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
The Bmw X4 M40d features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the John Cooper Works FWD’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw X4 M40d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.94 kg/hp vs 5.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.88 seconds. The 1.40 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 wins (4,81 s vs 6,21 s).
X4 M40d G02 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,81 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X4 M40d G02: 340 hp, ratio 5,94 kg/hp. John Cooper Works FWD: 231 hp, ratio 5,09 kg/hp.
X4 M40d G02: 250 km/h. John Cooper Works FWD: 251 km/h.