Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 gagne (4,81 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X4 M40d G02 | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,81 s−3,54 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,13 s−3,06 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,04 s−5,37 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+35 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,94 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X4 M40d G02 | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,18 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,93 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,44 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,81 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,53 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,29 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,75 s | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,13 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,04 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 020 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Bmw X4 M40d hits 100 km/h in 4.81 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Bmw X4 M40d leads by 3.54 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d is doing 139 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 2.10 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X4 M40d crosses the line in 13.13 s versus 16.19 s. The 3.06 s gap represents roughly 115 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 193 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X4 M40d finishes in 24.04 s versus 29.41 s, with a 5.37 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X4 M40d is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the E-PACE P200 at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.94 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 3.54 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 gagne (4,81 s vs 8,35 s).
X4 M40d G02 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,81 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X4 M40d G02 : 340 hp, ratio 5,94 kg/hp. E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
X4 M40d G02 : 250 km/h. E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h.