G02 · GENERATION 2021 · FAMILY SUV
BMWICE

X4 M40d

340 hp, 4,9 s 0-100 : among the 13 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X4 M40d ranks 10th of 13 in 0–100 km/h, 6th of 13 in Top speed, 11th of 13 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,52215,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

340hp

700 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.9s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

5.9L

/100 km

Tank

68L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X4 M40d

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 6 cyl.
Displacement2,993 cm\u00b3
Power340 hp
Couple700 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionX4 M40d

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5,9 L/100km
Tank68 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,9 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,752 mm
Wheelbase2,864 mm
Width1,938 mm
Height1,621 mm
Boot525 L
Kerb weight2,020 kg
Cd0.3
CO₂ WLTP156 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 13 D-SUV, the X4 M40d ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.

Less suitable for

Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X3 M Competition (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Jaguar F-PACE SVR (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.9 s 0-100 (10th of 13 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the X4 M40d ranks 10th of 13 in 0–100 km/h, 0.8 s off the reference Bmw X3 M Competition (4.1 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (6th of 13 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the X4 M40d stands against D-SUV

Comparison across 13 D-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.

0–100 km/h

10eout of 13

4,9 s
Min5,7 s · Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300
Max4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition

Top speed

6eout of 13

250 km/h
Min200 km/h · Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300
Max285 km/h · Jaguar F-PACE SVR

Power-to-weight

11eout of 13

168 hp/t
Min157 hp/t · Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300
Max272 hp/t · Jaguar F-PACE SVR

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X4 G02 range

Generation G02 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G02

Compare

Popular duels involving the X4 M40d

Take the next step

Find a X4 M40d or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X4 M40d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X4 M40d rank in its segment?#

Among the 13 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X4 M40d ranks 10th of 13 in 0–100 km/h (4.9 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition), 6th of 13 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR), 11th of 13 in Power-to-weight (168 hp/t, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR).

How much does the X4 M40d cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw X3 M Competition instead?#

The Bmw X3 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s vs 4.9 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X4 M40d vs Bmw X3 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.