Over 0–100 km/h, X6 M50i G06 wins (4,25 s vs 7,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X6 M50i G06 | Q5 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,25 s−3,09 s | 7,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s−2,99 s | 15,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s−6,47 s | 28,61 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+24 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,23 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X6 M50i G06 | Q5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,25 s | 1,12 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,06 s | 2,19 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,27 s | 4,81 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,25 s | 7,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,46 s | 10,60 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,75 s | 21,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,66 s | 40,96 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 15,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s | 28,61 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp | 8 cyl |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 955 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X6 M50i hits 100 km/h in 4.26 s versus 7.35 s for the Q5 SUV. At this point, the Bmw X6 M50i leads by 3.09 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X6 M50i is doing 154 km/h against 115 km/h for the Q5 SUV. The gap is 1.59 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X6 M50i crosses the line in 12.29 s versus 15.29 s. The 2.99 s gap represents roughly 113 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X6 M50i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 214 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X6 M50i finishes in 22.14 s versus 28.61 s, with a 6.47 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X6 M50i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Q5 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.23 kg/hp vs 9.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.47 seconds. The 3.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X6 M50i G06 wins (4,25 s vs 7,35 s).
X6 M50i G06 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,25 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X6 M50i G06: 530 hp, ratio 4,23 kg/hp. Q5 SUV: 204 hp, ratio 9,58 kg/hp.
X6 M50i G06: 250 km/h. Q5 SUV: 226 km/h.