Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 5,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X6 xDrive40d G06 | SQ2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s | 4,94 s+0,64 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,91 s | 13,47 s+0,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,49 s | 24,55 s+0,94 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 248 km/h | 257 km/h−9 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,51 kg/hp | 5,12 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X6 xDrive40d G06 | SQ2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 1,24 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,21 s | 2,07 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,95 s | 3,54 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,65 s | 7,19 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,50 s | 12,14 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,35 s | 19,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,91 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,49 s | 24,55 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h | 257 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 215 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ2 hits 100 km/h in 4.94 s versus 5.59 s for the Bmw X6 xDrive40d. At this point, the SQ2 leads by 0.64 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ2 is doing 133 km/h against 131 km/h for the Bmw X6 xDrive40d. The gap is 0.30 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ2 crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 13.91 s. The 0.44 s gap represents roughly 20 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the SQ2 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 182 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ2 finishes in 24.55 s versus 25.48 s, with a 0.93 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (248 vs 257 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 248 km/h, the Bmw X6 xDrive40d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.51 kg/hp vs 5.12 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.87 seconds. The 0.64 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 5,58 s).
X6 xDrive40d G06 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,58 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X6 xDrive40d G06: 340 hp, ratio 6,51 kg/hp. SQ2: 300 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp.
X6 xDrive40d G06: 248 km/h. SQ2: 257 km/h.