Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV gagne (4,04 s vs 4,72 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X7 M50i G07 | SQ7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,72 s | 4,04 s+0,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,87 s | 12,11 s+0,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,20 s | 21,94 s+1,26 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,68 kg/hp | 4,34 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X7 M50i G07 | SQ7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,34 s | 1,14 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,20 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,59 s | 3,07 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,72 s | 4,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,14 s | 5,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,02 s | 8,52 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,97 s | 13,41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,87 s | 12,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,20 s | 21,94 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | X7 M50i | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the SQ7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.04 s versus 4.72 s for the Bmw X7 M50i. At this point, the SQ7 SUV leads by 0.68 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ7 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 146 km/h for the Bmw X7 M50i. The gap is 0.54 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ7 SUV crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 12.87 s. The 0.76 s gap represents roughly 38 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 214 km/h versus 203 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ7 SUV finishes in 21.94 s versus 23.20 s, with a 1.26 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw X7 M50i and the SQ7 SUV are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.68 kg/hp vs 4.34 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.98 seconds. The 0.68 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV gagne (4,04 s vs 4,72 s).
X7 M50i G07 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,72 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X7 M50i G07 : 530 hp, ratio 4,68 kg/hp. SQ7 SUV : 507 hp, ratio 4,34 kg/hp.
X7 M50i G07 : 250 km/h. SQ7 SUV : 250 km/h.