G07 · GENERATION 2019 · LUXURY SUV
BMWICE

X7 M50i

530 hp, 4,7 s 0-100 : among the 6 F-SUV 2017–2021, the X7 M50i ranks 3rd of 6 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 6 in Top speed, 2nd of 6 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Urus. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,86415,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

530hp

750 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.7s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

11.1L

/100 km

Tank

83L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X7 M50i

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement4,395 cm\u00b3
Power530 hp
Couple750 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionX7 M50i

Consumption

Cons. WLTP11,1 L/100km
Tank83 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,7 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,151 mm
Wheelbase3,105 mm
Width2,000 mm
Height1,805 mm
Boot326 L
Kerb weight2,480 kg
Cd0.34
CO₂ WLTP252 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 6 F-SUV, the X7 M50i ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 2nd of 6 in Power-to-weight (214 hp/t). 2nd of 6 in Power-to-weight (214 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 11,1 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Urus (1st with 3.6 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Urus (1st with 305 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.7 s 0-100 (3rd of 6 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the X7 M50i ranks 3rd of 6 in 0–100 km/h, 1.1 s off the reference Lamborghini Urus (3.6 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (5th of 6 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 305 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the X7 M50i stands against F-SUV

Comparison across 6 F-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.

0–100 km/h

3eout of 6

4,7 s
Min6,1 s · Bmw X7 xDrive40i
Max3,6 s · Lamborghini Urus

Top speed

5eout of 6

250 km/h
Min245 km/h · Bmw X7 xDrive40i
Max305 km/h · Lamborghini Urus

Power-to-weight

2eout of 6

214 hp/t
Min147 hp/t · Bmw X7 xDrive40i
Max295 hp/t · Lamborghini Urus

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X7 G07 range

Generation G07 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G07

Compare

Popular duels involving the X7 M50i

Take the next step

Find a X7 M50i or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X7 M50i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X7 M50i rank in its segment?#

Among the 6 F-SUV 2017–2021, the X7 M50i ranks 3rd of 6 in 0–100 km/h (4.7 s, behind the Lamborghini Urus), 5th of 6 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Urus), 2nd of 6 in Power-to-weight (214 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Urus).

How much does the X7 M50i cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Lamborghini Urus instead?#

The Lamborghini Urus leads in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s vs 4.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X7 M50i vs Lamborghini Urus duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.