Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo 958.1 gagne (4,45 s vs 4,74 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X7 M50i G07 | Cayenne Turbo 958.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,74 s | 4,45 s+0,29 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,93 s | 12,60 s+0,33 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,38 s | 22,82 s+0,56 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 276 km/h−26 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,70 kg/hp | 4,17 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X7 M50i G07 | Cayenne Turbo 958.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,24 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,15 s | 2,07 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,56 s | 3,38 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,74 s | 4,45 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,21 s | 5,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,27 s | 9,55 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,52 s | 15,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,93 s | 12,60 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,38 s | 22,82 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 276 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp | 8 cyl |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 490 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp | Engine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 170 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Cayenne Turbo hits 100 km/h in 4.45 s versus 4.74 s for the Bmw X7 M50i. At this point, the Cayenne Turbo leads by 0.29 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne Turbo is doing 149 km/h against 144 km/h for the Bmw X7 M50i. The gap is 0.20 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne Turbo crosses the line in 12.59 s versus 12.92 s. The 0.33 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne Turbo continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 205 km/h versus 201 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne Turbo finishes in 22.82 s versus 23.38 s, with a 0.56 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X7 M50i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne Turbo at 278 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.70 kg/hp vs 4.17 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs auto).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.08 seconds. The 0.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo 958.1 gagne (4,45 s vs 4,74 s).
X7 M50i G07 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,74 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X7 M50i G07 : 530 hp, ratio 4,70 kg/hp. Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 520 hp, ratio 4,17 kg/hp.
X7 M50i G07 : 250 km/h. Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 276 km/h.