Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Long Range gagne (4,29 s vs 5,19 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Long Range | XM 50e G09 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,29 s−0,90 s | 5,19 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,14 s−1,30 s | 13,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,65 s−2,65 s | 24,30 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,67 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,50 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Long Range | XM 50e G09 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,28 s | 1,39 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,13 s | 2,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,42 s | 3,82 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,29 s | 5,19 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,30 s | 6,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,29 s | 11,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,64 s | 18,84 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,14 s | 13,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,65 s | 24,30 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 660 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 620 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Model X Long Range hits 100 km/h in 4.30 s versus 5.19 s for the Bmw XM 50e. At this point, the Model X Long Range leads by 0.90 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X Long Range is doing 158 km/h against 139 km/h for the Bmw XM 50e. The gap is 0.73 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Long Range crosses the line in 12.14 s versus 13.44 s. The 1.30 s gap represents roughly 61 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 221 km/h versus 193 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Long Range finishes in 21.65 s versus 24.30 s, with a 2.65 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Model X Long Range and the Bmw XM 50e are governed to 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.67 kg/hp vs 5.50 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.89 seconds. The 0.90 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Long Range gagne (4,29 s vs 5,19 s).
Model X Long Range passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X Long Range : 670 hp, ratio 3,67 kg/hp. XM 50e G09 : 476 hp, ratio 5,50 kg/hp.
Model X Long Range : 250 km/h. XM 50e G09 : 250 km/h.