Sur 0–100 km/h, Z4 M40i G29 gagne (4,54 s vs 4,75 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Z4 M40i G29 | Boxster Spyder 987 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,54 s−0,21 s | 4,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s−0,11 s | 12,81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,95 s−0,03 s | 22,98 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 272 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,51 kg/hp | 3,98 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Z4 M40i G29 | Boxster Spyder 987 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,27 s | 1,27 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,12 s | 2,12 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,42 s | 3,75 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,54 s | 4,75 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,95 s | 6,27 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,74 s | 9,61 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,46 s | 15,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,70 s | 12,81 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,95 s | 22,98 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Z4 M40i | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp | B6 |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Bmw Z4 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.54 s versus 4.75 s for the Boxster Spyder. At this point, the Bmw Z4 M40i leads by 0.21 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw Z4 M40i is doing 147 km/h against 148 km/h for the Boxster Spyder. The gap is 0.15 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw Z4 M40i crosses the line in 12.70 s versus 12.80 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 6 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Bmw Z4 M40i maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h while the Boxster Spyder keeps accelerating towards 272 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.06 s.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw Z4 M40i finishes in 22.95 s versus 22.97 s, with just 0.03 s to spare. The Boxster Spyder fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw Z4 M40i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.51 kg/hp vs 3.98 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.05 seconds. The 0.21 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Z4 M40i G29 gagne (4,54 s vs 4,75 s).
Z4 M40i G29 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,54 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Z4 M40i G29 : 340 hp, ratio 4,51 kg/hp. Boxster Spyder 987 : 320 hp, ratio 3,98 kg/hp.
Z4 M40i G29 : 250 km/h. Boxster Spyder 987 : 272 km/h.