Sur 0–100 km/h, Terramar gagne (8,31 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Terramar | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,31 s−0,04 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,25 s | 16,19 s+0,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,41 s+0,00 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 214 km/h | 215 km/h−1 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,00 kg/hp | 8,74 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Terramar | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,27 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,44 s | 3,33 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,00 s | 5,88 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,31 s | 8,35 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,46 s | 11,44 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,91 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,12 s | 45,14 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 16,25 s | 16,19 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 810 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Terramar hits 100 km/h in 8.31 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. The instant torque of 300 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.04 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the E-PACE P200 is doing 115 km/h against 116 km/h for the Terramar. The gap is 0.11 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the E-PACE P200 crosses the line in 16.19 s versus 16.25 s. The 0.06 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory — both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.00 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere — range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Electronically capped at 215 km/h, the E-PACE P200 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 0.04 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Terramar gagne (8,31 s vs 8,35 s).
Terramar passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,31 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Terramar : 201 hp, ratio 9,00 kg/hp. E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
Terramar : 214 km/h. E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h.