Sur 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 gagne (5,98 s vs 6,33 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | 530e xDrive G60 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s−0,35 s | 6,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s−0,25 s | 14,52 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s | 26,12 s+0,29 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+5 km/h | 225 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,23 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,87 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | 530e xDrive G60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,61 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 2,69 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,09 s | 4,60 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s | 6,33 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,25 s | 8,51 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,16 s | 14,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,87 s | 23,76 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s | 14,52 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s | 26,12 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 225 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 055 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 hits 100 km/h in 5.98 s versus 6.33 s for the Bmw 530e xDrive. At this point, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 leads by 0.35 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 is doing 127 km/h against 128 km/h for the Bmw 530e xDrive. The gap is 0.35 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 crosses the line in 14.27 s versus 14.51 s. The 0.24 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Bmw 530e xDrive maxes out at 225 km/h while the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 keeps accelerating towards 230 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.10 s.
Around 718 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Bmw 530e xDrive overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 5 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 530e xDrive finishes in 26.12 s versus 26.41 s. The 0.29 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 225 km/h, the Bmw 530e xDrive never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.23 kg/hp vs 6.87 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.78 seconds. The 0.35 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 gagne (5,98 s vs 6,33 s).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,98 secondes (simulation calibrée).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 : 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp. 530e xDrive G60 : 299 hp, ratio 6,87 kg/hp.
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 : 230 km/h. 530e xDrive G60 : 225 km/h.