Sur 0–100 km/h, DS9 E-Tense 250 gagne (8,36 s vs 11,08 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS9 E-Tense 250 | 216i F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s−2,72 s | 11,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s−1,56 s | 17,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s−4,26 s | 32,83 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h+46 km/h | 189 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,51 kg/hpbetter ratio | 12,52 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS9 E-Tense 250 | 216i F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,40 s | 2,03 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,01 s | 3,59 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,47 s | 7,39 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 11,08 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,88 s | 16,11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,12 s | 34,47 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,70 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 17,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s | 32,83 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 189 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 109 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 190 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 365 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the DS9 E-Tense 250 hits 100 km/h in 8.36 s versus 11.08 s for the Bmw 216i. The instant torque of 520 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the DS9 E-Tense 250 leads by 2.72 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the DS9 E-Tense 250 is doing 121 km/h against 102 km/h for the Bmw 216i. The gap is 0.51 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the DS9 E-Tense 250 crosses the line in 16.22 s versus 17.78 s. The 1.56 s gap represents roughly 53 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the DS9 E-Tense 250 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 170 km/h versus 140 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the DS9 E-Tense 250 finishes in 28.57 s versus 32.82 s, with a 4.26 s lead.
Electronically capped at 190 km/h, the Bmw 216i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 19.32 seconds. The 2.72 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, DS9 E-Tense 250 gagne (8,36 s vs 11,08 s).
DS9 E-Tense 250 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,36 secondes (simulation calibrée).
DS9 E-Tense 250 : 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. 216i F44 : 109 hp, ratio 12,52 kg/hp.
DS9 E-Tense 250 : 235 km/h. 216i F44 : 189 km/h.