Sur 0–100 km/h, Portofino gagne (3,55 s vs 4,78 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Portofino | Panamera 4S 970.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,55 s−1,23 s | 4,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s−2,06 s | 12,98 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,36 s−4,22 s | 23,58 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 348 km/h+73 km/h | 275 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,58 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,23 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Portofino | Panamera 4S 970.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,29 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,77 s | 2,13 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,84 s | 3,51 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,55 s | 4,78 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,29 s | 6,26 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,26 s | 10,48 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 9,00 s | 17,20 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s | 12,98 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,36 s | 23,58 s |
| Top speed | 348 km/h | 275 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 545 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Portofino | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 860 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Portofino hits 100 km/h in 3.55 s versus 4.78 s for the Panamera 4S. At this point, the Portofino leads by 1.23 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Portofino is doing 177 km/h against 142 km/h for the Panamera 4S. The gap is 1.18 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Portofino crosses the line in 10.92 s versus 12.98 s. The 2.06 s gap represents roughly 98 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Portofino continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 249 km/h versus 198 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Portofino finishes in 19.36 s versus 23.57 s, with a 4.22 s lead.
Electronically capped at 283 km/h, the Panamera 4S never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.58 kg/hp vs 4.23 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.26 seconds. The 1.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Portofino gagne (3,55 s vs 4,78 s).
Portofino passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,55 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Portofino : 600 hp, ratio 2,58 kg/hp. Panamera 4S 970.1 : 440 hp, ratio 4,23 kg/hp.
Portofino : 348 km/h. Panamera 4S 970.1 : 275 km/h.