Sur 0–100 km/h, Roma gagne (3,43 s vs 7,43 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Roma | 220d xDrive Gran Coupe F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,43 s−4,00 s | 7,43 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,68 s−4,76 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,88 s−9,43 s | 28,31 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 357 km/h+126 km/h | 231 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,37 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,24 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Roma | 220d xDrive Gran Coupe F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,03 s | 1,60 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,71 s | 2,67 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,75 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,43 s | 7,43 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,14 s | 10,38 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,92 s | 19,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,39 s | 36,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,68 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,88 s | 28,31 s |
| Top speed | 357 km/h | 231 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 620 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 472 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Roma | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 565 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Roma hits 100 km/h in 3.43 s versus 7.43 s for the Bmw 220d xDrive Gran Coupe. At this point, the Roma leads by 4.00 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Roma is doing 182 km/h against 118 km/h for the Bmw 220d xDrive Gran Coupe. The gap is 2.81 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Roma crosses the line in 10.68 s versus 15.43 s. The 4.76 s gap represents roughly 178 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Roma continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 256 km/h versus 163 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Roma finishes in 18.88 s versus 28.31 s, with a 9.43 s lead.
Electronically capped at 234 km/h, the Bmw 220d xDrive Gran Coupe never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.37 kg/hp vs 8.24 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.14 seconds. The 4.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Roma gagne (3,43 s vs 7,43 s).
Roma passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,43 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Roma : 620 hp, ratio 2,37 kg/hp. 220d xDrive Gran Coupe F44 : 190 hp, ratio 8,24 kg/hp.
Roma : 357 km/h. 220d xDrive Gran Coupe F44 : 231 km/h.