Performance duelHome › Duel

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT vs Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD : which one is faster?

0-100 km/h, 400 m, 1000 m, top speed — physics simulation calibrated on 7 measures.

400 m
120
0 – 100 km/h
3.73s
1.19 s
Mustang
4.93s
400 m standing start
12.00s
1.15 s
Mustang
13.15s
Top speed
200
20 km/h
Mustang
180
Power487 ch
Power408 ch
Torque860 Nm
Torque670 Nm
Weight2 108 kg
Weight2 110 kg
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
GearboxAutomatic · 2-spee…
GearboxAutomatic · 2-spee…
Faster
Ford
Mustang Mach-E GT
2021
3,73 s
200 km/h
Power487 ch
Torque860 Nm
Weight2 108 kg
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
Volvo
EX40 Twin Motor AWD
2024
4,92 s
180 km/h
Power408 ch
Torque670 Nm
Weight2 110 kg
DrivetrainAll-wheel drive (AWD)
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT
2021 · ELECTRIC · 487 ch
Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD
2024 · PETROL · 408 ch
0-30 km/h1,02 s
0-50 km/h1,70 s
0-80 km/h2,78 s
0-100 km/h3,73 s
0-120 km/h4,94 s
0-160 km/h8,62 s
0-200 km/h14,27 s
400 m DA12,00 s
1 000 m DA22,87 s
VMax200 km/h
0-30 km/h1,60 s
0-50 km/h2,47 s
0-80 km/h3,74 s
0-100 km/h4,92 s
0-120 km/h6,42 s
0-160 km/h10,52 s
0-200 km/h---
400 m DA13,15 s
1 000 m DA25,14 s
VMax180 km/h
— : non calculé (vitesse max constructeur inférieure au seuil)
DQM96%
Mustang Mach-E GT
--
EX40 Twin Motor AWD
--

Simulation de performance

Race simulation at real speed

CONFIDENCE 96%
400 m result
12.00s
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Gap
1.15s
Distance
400 m
Dist.
Mustang Mach-E
Gap
EX40 Twin
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
0 m
0.00 s
0 km/h
100 m
5.16 s
123 km/h
~24 m
5 long.
5.95 s
114 km/h
200 m
7.76 s
152 km/h
~37 m
8 long.
8.72 s
144 km/h
400 m
11.99 s
186 km/h
~56 m
12 long.
13.14 s
179 km/h
600 m
15.67 s
200 km/h
~74 m
16 long.
17.14 s
180 km/h
1,000 m
22.87 s
200 km/h
~114 m
25 long.
25.14 s
180 km/h

Calibrated physics simulation: SCx via VMax, power curves, Crr via WLTP, drivetrain losses. Manufacturer 0-100 is the calibration target. Confidence 96 %.

400 m
RACE MODE

Upcoming offersExclusive

Receive personalized offers

Pour recevoir les meilleures offres près de chez vous



Mustang Mach-E GT vs EX40 Twin Motor AWD: chronicle of a drag race at 200 km/h

The launch: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E GT hits 100 km/h in 3.73 s versus 4.93 s for the EX40 Twin Motor AWD. The instant torque of 860 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Mustang Mach-E GT leads by 1.19 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT is doing 152 km/h against 144 km/h for the EX40 Twin Motor AWD. The gap is 0.96 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E GT crosses the line in 11.99 s versus 13.14 s. The 1.15 s gap represents roughly 56 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 200 km/h versus 180 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT finishes in 22.87 s versus 25.14 s, with a 2.27 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Mustang Mach-E GT is capped at 200 km/h, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.30 seconds. The 1.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT has a clear edge over the Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD to 100 km/h. This difference is clearly noticeable in spirited driving and widens on standing starts.

Données de performance issues de simulations physiques calibrées (moteur Apex). Consommation basée sur les données WLTP constructeur. Les performances réelles peuvent varier selon les conditions d'utilisation.

Prix énergie indicatifs : essence 1,85€/L, diesel 1,75€/L, électricité 0,25€/kWh (tarif domestique). Calculs basés sur 20 000 km/an.

Caralogy est un service indépendant de comparaison. Les données affichées sont fournies à titre informatif et ne constituent pas une offre commerciale.