I · GENERATION 2024 · COMPACT SUV
VolvoBEV

EX40 Twin Motor AWD

408 hp, 340 km range, 4,9 s 0-100 : among the 3 C-SUV electric 2022–2026, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD ranks WLTP range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate60715,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

408hp

670 Nm · 408 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

4.9s

VMax 180 km/h

Range

340km

WLTP

DC charging

kW

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Puissance électrique408 hp
Combined power408 hp
Couple670 Nm
GearboxREDUCER_2SPEED Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Battery and charging

Battery capacity79 kWh
Range WLTP340 km
Conso élec WLTP21,3 kWh/100km
Cons. WLTP21,3 L/100km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,9 s
VMax180 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Kerb weight2,110 kg
Cd0.32

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 3 C-SUV electric, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD ranks in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 0–100 km/h (4.9 s). 0–100 km/h (4.9 s).

Less suitable for

Long motorway trips without charging planning. With 340 km WLTP (around 238 km in motorway/winter conditions), expect regular charging stops.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (1st with 517 km) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 340 km WLTP (WLTP range)

The EX40 Twin Motor AWD offers 340 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (517 km).

Segment positioning

Where the EX40 Twin Motor AWD stands against C-SUV electric

Comparison across 3 C-SUV electric marketed between 2022–2026.

WLTP range

3eout of 3

340 km
Min340 km · Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD
Max517 km · Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW

0–100 km/h

1eout of 3

4,9 s
Min5,6 s · Bmw iX1 xDrive30
Max4,9 s · Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Volvo EX40 I range

Generation I launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the I

Compare

Popular duels involving the EX40 Twin Motor AWD

Take the next step

Find a EX40 Twin Motor AWD or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the EX40 Twin Motor AWD rank in its segment?#

Among the 3 C-SUV electric 2022–2026, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD ranks WLTP range (340 km, behind the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW), 0–100 km/h (4.9 s, behind the Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD).

What is the WLTP range of the EX40 Twin Motor AWD?#

340 km WLTP announced — making it the autonomie du segment out of 3 models. The reference is the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (517 km).

How much does the EX40 Twin Motor AWD cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW instead?#

The Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW leads in WLTP range (517 km vs 340 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.