Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD
408 hp, 340 km range, 4,9 s 0-100 : among the 4 C-SUV electric 2022–2026, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD ranks WLTP range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 408 hp
- 670 Nm, dont 408 hp elec
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.9 s
- VMax 180 km/h
- Range
- 340 km
- WLTP
- DC charging
- -
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Electric power
- 408 hp
- Combined power
- 408 hp
- Couple
- 670 Nm
- Gearbox
- Mono-rapport Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Battery and charging
- Battery capacity
- 79 kWh
- Range WLTP
- 340 km
- EV cons. WLTP
- 21.3 kWh/100 km
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,9 s
- VMax
- 180 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Kerb weight
- 2,110 kg
- Cd
- 0.32
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 4 C-SUV electric, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD ranks in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 0–100 km/h (4.9 s). 0–100 km/h (4.9 s).
Long motorway trips without charging planning. With 340 km WLTP (around 238 km in motorway/winter conditions), expect regular charging stops.
If the priority is WLTP range, the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (1st with 517 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 Recharge Twin AWD (1st with 4.9 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 340 km WLTP (WLTP range)
The EX40 Twin Motor AWD offers 340 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (517 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceReal-world range
Simulate range by speed, temperature and driving style.
Simulate rangeWhere the EX40 Twin Motor AWD stands against C-SUV electric
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Volvo EX40 I range
Generation I launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the I
Popular duels involving the EX40 Twin Motor AWD
Continue with the Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD
The same car, from other angles.
Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the EX40 Twin Motor AWD rank in its segment?
Among the 4 C-SUV electric 2022–2026, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD ranks WLTP range (340 km, behind the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW), 0–100 km/h (4.9 s, behind the Volvo XC40 Recharge Twin AWD).
What is the WLTP range of the EX40 Twin Motor AWD?
340 km WLTP announced - making it the WLTP range out of 4 models. The reference is the Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW (517 km).
How much does the EX40 Twin Motor AWD cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW instead?
The Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW leads in WLTP range (517 km vs 340 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Audi Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.