Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE P400e wins (5,37 s vs 5,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-PACE P400e | 740Le iPerformance G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,37 s−0,21 s | 5,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,60 s−0,17 s | 13,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s−0,45 s | 25,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 220 km/h | 250 km/h−30 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,55 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-PACE P400e | 740Le iPerformance G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,29 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,33 s | 2,14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,92 s | 3,85 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,37 s | 5,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,10 s | 7,52 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,03 s | 12,85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,71 s | 21,11 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,60 s | 13,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s | 25,05 s |
| Top speed limited | 220 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 404 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 640 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 243 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 940 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the F-PACE P400e hits 100 km/h in 5.37 s versus 5.58 s for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. Despite the faster sprint time, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance is 3 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the F-PACE P400e is doing 137 km/h against 132 km/h for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. The gap is 0.03 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-PACE P400e crosses the line in 13.60 s versus 13.77 s. The 0.17 s gap represents roughly 8 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the F-PACE P400e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-PACE P400e finishes in 24.60 s versus 25.05 s, with a 0.45 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), the Bmw 740Le iPerformance never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-PACE P400e is capped at 220 km/h, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.55 kg/hp vs 5.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.68 seconds. The 0.21 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE P400e wins (5,37 s vs 5,58 s).
F-PACE P400e goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-PACE P400e: 404 hp, ratio 5,55 kg/hp. 740Le iPerformance G11: 326 hp, ratio 5,95 kg/hp.
F-PACE P400e: 220 km/h. 740Le iPerformance G11: 250 km/h.