Among the 4 D-SUV plug-in hybrid 2019–2023, the F-PACE P400e ranks Electric WLTP range (65 km, behind the Jaguar F-PACE P400e), Combined range (741 km, behind the Jaguar F-PACE P400e), Thermal cons. estimated (10.2 L/100, behind the DS DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300), 0–100 km/h (5.3 s, behind the Volvo XC60 T8 AWD Recharge).
F-PACE P400e
404 hp, 65 km electric range, 5,3 s 0-100 : among the 4 D-SUV plug-in hybrid 2019–2023, the F-PACE P400e ranks Electric WLTP range, Combined range, Thermal cons. estimated, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
404hp
640 Nm · 143 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
5.3s
VMax 220 km/h
Total range
741km
of which 65 km elec
Battery + Tank
13.7kWh
+ 69 L tank
Full specifications Jaguar F-PACE P400e
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 143 hp |
| Combined power | 404 hp |
| Couple | 640 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 13.7 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 65 km |
| Charge AC max | 7.4 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 21.1 kWh/100km |
| Petrol cons. WLTP | 2.5 L/100km |
| Conso thermique | 10.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 69 L |
| EV range motorway | 52 km |
| Total range motorway | 741 km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,3 s |
| VMax | 220 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,731 mm |
| Width | 1,936 mm |
| Height | 1,660 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,243 kg |
| Cd | 0.34 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 4 D-SUV plug-in hybrid, the F-PACE P400e combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use, a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the F-PACE P400e through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Home-to-office commute up to 60 km in pure electric. Overnight charging is sufficient. Electric WLTP range (65 km), Combined range (741 km), Thermal cons. estimated (10.2 L/100), 0–100 km/h (5.3 s).
If the priority is Thermal cons. estimated, the DS DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 (1st with 6.0 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 T8 AWD Recharge (1st with 4.9 s) takes the lead.
In the city: 65 km pure electric
With a full battery, the F-PACE P400e drives in pure electric mode for the first 65 km WLTP — placing it Electric WLTP range, behind the Jaguar F-PACE P400e (65 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the F-PACE P400e behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →PHEV vs HEV: when combustion takes back the lead
En dessous de ≈ 325 km par trajet, la F-PACE P400e roule moins cher que le HEV médian du segment. Au-delà, le thermique reprend l’avantage.
Where the F-PACE P400e stands against D-SUV plug-in hybrid
Comparison across 4 D-SUV plug-in hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the F-PACE P400e
Jaguar F-PACE P400e: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
65 km WLTP announced — making it the autonomie du segment out of 4 models. The reference is the Jaguar F-PACE P400e (65 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.