Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-TYPE P300 | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s−2,72 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s−2,50 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s−5,06 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+35 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,32 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-TYPE P300 | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,61 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,69 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,30 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,17 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,54 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,21 s | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the F-TYPE P300 hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the F-TYPE P300 leads by 2.72 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE P300 is doing 140 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 1.47 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE P300 crosses the line in 13.69 s versus 16.19 s. The 2.50 s gap represents roughly 95 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE P300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE P300 finishes in 24.35 s versus 29.41 s, with a 5.06 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-TYPE P300 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the E-PACE P200 at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.32 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 2.72 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 8,35 s).
F-TYPE P300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp. E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h. E-PACE P200: 215 km/h.