Sur 0–100 km/h, Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG gagne (5,63 s vs 5,75 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| IS 350 F Sport RWD | Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,75 s | 5,63 s+0,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,83 s | 13,82 s+0,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,69 s−0,02 s | 24,71 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 291 km/h−41 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,58 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,15 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | IS 350 F Sport RWD | Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,58 s | 1,53 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,63 s | 2,55 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,25 s | 4,26 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,75 s | 5,63 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,39 s | 7,47 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,01 s | 12,14 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,23 s | 19,33 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 13,83 s | 13,82 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,69 s | 24,71 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 291 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 311 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 380 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 735 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG (DQ381) |
Off the line, the Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG hits 100 km/h in 5.64 s versus 5.76 s for the IS 350 F Sport RWD. At this point, the Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG leads by 0.12 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG is doing 136 km/h against 137 km/h for the IS 350 F Sport RWD. The gap is 0.04 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG crosses the line in 13.81 s versus 13.83 s. The 0.01 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The IS 350 F Sport RWD maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h while the Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG keeps accelerating towards 291 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.01 s.
Around 796 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the IS 350 F Sport RWD overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 41 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the IS 350 F Sport RWD finishes in 24.69 s versus 24.70 s. The 0.02 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the IS 350 F Sport RWD never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.58 kg/hp vs 6.15 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.49 seconds. The 0.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG gagne (5,63 s vs 5,75 s).
IS 350 F Sport RWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,75 secondes (simulation calibrée).
IS 350 F Sport RWD : 311 hp, ratio 5,58 kg/hp. Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG : 265 hp, ratio 6,15 kg/hp.
IS 350 F Sport RWD : 250 km/h. Superb 2.0 TSI 265 7DSG : 291 km/h.