Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AAMGPHEVvsBModel 3BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsAMG · Model 3

Mercedes AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206 vs Tesla Model 3 Performance: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

saloon · 2024 vs 2019 · Methodology
MercedesPHEV

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206

680 hp · 1020 Nm · 2,165 kg · 2024

VS
TeslaBEV

Model 3 Performance

450 hp · 713 Nm · 1,836 kg · 2019

Result · 0–100 km/h

AMercedes AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206

3.39 s

Gap0.03 sNot a significant gap
BTesla Model 3 Performance

3.36 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureAMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206Model 3 PerformanceGap
0–100 km/h3.39 s3.36 s0.03 s · Model 3 Performance
400 m standing start11.07 s11.58 s0.51 s · AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206
1,000 m standing start19.81 s21.36 s1.55 s · AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206
Top speed (electronically limited)280 km/h261 km/h19 km/h · AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206
Power-to-weight ratio3.18 kg/hp4.08 kg/hpbetter ratio · AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

MercedesPHEVAMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
TeslaBEVModel 3 Performance
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageAMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206Model 3 Performance
0–30 km/h0.93 s0.89 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h1.56 s1.49 s · tight gap
0–80 km/h2.56 s2.47 s · tight gap
0–100 km/h3.39 s3.36 s · tight gap
0–120 km/h4.28 s4.49 s
0–160 km/h6.70 s7.86 s
0–200 km/h9.87 s12.81 s
400 m standing start11.07 s11.58 s
1,000 m standing start19.81 s21.36 s
Top speed280 km/h261 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Mercedes

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206

3,18kg/hpratio better by 0,90 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power680 hpPending
Torque1020 Nm
Weight2 165 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
Tesla

Model 3 Performance

4,08kg/hpcompensated by −329 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power450 hpDual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque713 Nm
Weight1 836 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.36 s versus 3.39 s for the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE is doing 169 km/h against 156 km/h for the Model 3 Performance. The gap is 0.15 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE crosses the line in 11.06 s versus 11.57 s. The 0.51 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 240 km/h versus 215 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE finishes in 19.80 s versus 21.35 s, with a 1.55 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE is capped at 280 km/h, the Model 3 Performance at 261 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.18 kg/hp vs 4.08 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.18 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

MercedesVSAudi

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs RS 5 Avant

TeslaVSVolvo

Model 3 Performance vs V60 T8 AWD Recharge

MercedesVSAudi

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs RS 5 Sedan

BMWVSTesla

i4 M50 xDrive vs Model 3 Performance

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206 and Model 3 Performance are neck and neck (3,36 s vs 3,39 s, no significant gap).

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,39 seconds (calibrated simulation).

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206: 680 hp, ratio 3,18 kg/hp. Model 3 Performance: 450 hp, ratio 4,08 kg/hp.

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206: 280 km/h. Model 3 Performance: 261 km/h.