Sur 0–100 km/h, V 300 d 4MATIC (long) gagne (8,32 s vs 8,32 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| V 300 d 4MATIC | V 300 d 4MATIC (long) | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,32 s | 8,32 s+0,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,03 s | 16,03 s+0,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,56 s | 29,56 s+0,00 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,44 kg/hp | 9,44 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | V 300 d 4MATIC | V 300 d 4MATIC (long) |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,60 s | 1,60 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,77 s | 2,77 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,51 s | 5,51 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,32 s | 8,32 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,54 s | 11,54 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 22,22 s | 22,22 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 51,69 s | 51,69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,03 s | 16,03 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,56 s | 29,56 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 312 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 312 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the V 300 d 4MATIC hits 100 km/h in 8.32 s versus 8.32 s for the V 300 d 4MATIC (long). The 0.00 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the V 300 d 4MATIC is doing 114 km/h against 114 km/h for the V 300 d 4MATIC (long). The gap is 0.00 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the V 300 d 4MATIC crosses the line in 16.03 s versus 16.03 s. The 0.00 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory — both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.00 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere — range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the V 300 d 4MATIC and the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) are governed to 217 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.44 kg/hp vs 9.44 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.08 seconds. The 0.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, V 300 d 4MATIC (long) gagne (8,32 s vs 8,32 s).
V 300 d 4MATIC passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,32 secondes (simulation calibrée).
V 300 d 4MATIC : 245 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp. V 300 d 4MATIC (long) : 245 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp.
V 300 d 4MATIC : 210 km/h. V 300 d 4MATIC (long) : 210 km/h.