Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)
245 hp, 8,2 s 0-100 : among the 4 M 2022–2026, the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 245 hp
- 500 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8.2 s
- VMax 217 km/h
- Cons.
- 8.7 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 70 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,950 cm³
- Power
- 245 hp
- Couple
- 500 Nm
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 8.7 L/100 km
- Tank
- 70 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 8,2 s
- VMax
- 217 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,140 mm
- Wheelbase
- 3,200 mm
- Width
- 1,928 mm
- Height
- 1,901 mm
- Boot
- 1030 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,312 kg
- CO₂ WLTP
- 229 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 4 M, the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
M among the best in segment: Tank range (805 km), 0–100 km/h (8.2 s).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 8,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Citroen Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD (1st with 6.2 L/100) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 8.7 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)
The V 300 d 4MATIC (long) consumes 8.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Citroen Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD (6.2 L/100).
Tank range: 805 km (Tank range)
On a full tank, the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) covers 805 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 805 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) stands against M
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Mercedes V range
Other versions
Popular duels involving the V 300 d 4MATIC (long)
Continue with the Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)
The same car, from other angles.
Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long): what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) rank in its segment?
Among the 4 M 2022–2026, the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) ranks Combined consumption (8.7 L/100, behind the Citroen Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD), Tank range (805 km, behind the Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)), 0–100 km/h (8.2 s, behind the Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)).
What is the range of the V 300 d 4MATIC (long)?
805 km on a full tank (8.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) - Tank range.
How much does the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Citroen Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD instead?
The Citroen Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD leads in Combined consumption (6.2 L/100 vs 8.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs Citroen Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.