2024 · GENERATION 2024 · MPV
MercedesICE

V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

245 hp, 8,2 s 0-100 : among the 3 M 2022–2026, the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,24515,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

245hp

500 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

8.2s

VMax 217 km/h

Cons.

8.7L

/100 km

Tank

70L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement1,950 cm\u00b3
Power245 hp
Couple500 Nm
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP8,7 L/100km
Tank70 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h8,2 s
VMax217 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,140 mm
Wheelbase3,200 mm
Width1,928 mm
Height1,901 mm
Boot1030 L
Kerb weight2,312 kg
CO₂ WLTP229 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 3 M, the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

M among the best in segment: Tank range (805 km), 0–100 km/h (8.2 s).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 8,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216i Active Tourer (1st with 6.7 L/100) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 8.7 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)

The V 300 d 4MATIC (long) consumes 8.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216i Active Tourer (6.7 L/100).

Tank range: 805 km (Tank range)

On a full tank, the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) covers 805 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 805 km.

Segment positioning

Where the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) stands against M

Comparison across 3 M marketed between 2022–2026.

Combined consumption

2eout of 3

8.7 L/100
Min8.7 L/100 · Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC
Max6.7 L/100 · Bmw 216i Active Tourer

Tank range

1eout of 3

805 km
Min672 km · Bmw 216i Active Tourer
Max805 km · Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

0–100 km/h

1eout of 3

8,2 s
Min10,3 s · Bmw 216i Active Tourer
Max8,2 s · Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Mercedes V range

Other versions

Compare

Popular duels involving the V 300 d 4MATIC (long)

Take the next step

Find a V 300 d 4MATIC (long) or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long): what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) rank in its segment?#

Among the 3 M 2022–2026, the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) ranks Combined consumption (8.7 L/100, behind the Bmw 216i Active Tourer), Tank range (805 km, behind the Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)), 0–100 km/h (8.2 s, behind the Mercedes V 300 d 4MATIC (long)).

What is the range of the V 300 d 4MATIC (long)?#

805 km on a full tank (8.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — autonomie du segment.

How much does the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw 216i Active Tourer instead?#

The Bmw 216i Active Tourer leads in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100 vs 8.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs Bmw 216i Active Tourer duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.