Over 0–100 km/h, John Cooper Works FWD wins (6,21 s vs 7,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| John Cooper Works FWD | 420d G22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,21 s−0,83 s | 7,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,26 s−0,85 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,30 s−2,48 s | 27,78 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 251 km/h+11 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,09 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | John Cooper Works FWD | 420d G22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,85 s | 1,37 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,09 s | 2,40 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,95 s | 4,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,21 s | 7,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,93 s | 9,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,59 s | 18,13 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,51 s | 33,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,26 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,30 s | 27,78 s |
| Top speed | 251 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 175 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 605 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the John Cooper Works FWD hits 100 km/h in 6.21 s versus 7.04 s for the 420d. Despite the faster sprint time, the 420d is 8 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the John Cooper Works FWD is doing 137 km/h against 119 km/h for the 420d. The gap is 0.13 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the John Cooper Works FWD crosses the line in 14.26 s versus 15.10 s. The 0.84 s gap represents roughly 34 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the John Cooper Works FWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the John Cooper Works FWD finishes in 25.29 s versus 27.77 s, with a 2.48 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (251 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 240 km/h, the 420d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.09 kg/hp vs 8.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.60 seconds. The 0.83 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, John Cooper Works FWD wins (6,21 s vs 7,04 s).
John Cooper Works FWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,21 seconds (calibrated simulation).
John Cooper Works FWD: 231 hp, ratio 5,09 kg/hp. 420d G22: 190 hp, ratio 8,45 kg/hp.
John Cooper Works FWD: 251 km/h. 420d G22: 240 km/h.