Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 xDrive30d G02 gagne (5,86 s vs 7,11 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne (6-speed manual) 958.1 | X4 xDrive30d G02 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,11 s | 5,86 s+1,25 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,11 s | 14,18 s+0,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,25 s | 26,05 s+1,20 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 240 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,87 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne (6-speed manual) 958.1 | X4 xDrive30d G02 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,69 s | 1,42 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,08 s | 2,29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,00 s | 4,12 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,11 s | 5,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,24 s | 8,07 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,17 s | 14,44 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 29,15 s | 25,85 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,11 s | 14,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,25 s | 26,05 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 304 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 820 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X4 xDrive30d hits 100 km/h in 5.86 s versus 7.11 s for the Cayenne (6-speed manual). At this point, the Bmw X4 xDrive30d leads by 1.25 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X4 xDrive30d is doing 129 km/h against 125 km/h for the Cayenne (6-speed manual). The gap is 0.75 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X4 xDrive30d crosses the line in 14.18 s versus 15.11 s. The 0.93 s gap represents roughly 39 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X4 xDrive30d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X4 xDrive30d finishes in 26.04 s versus 27.24 s, with a 1.20 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (230 vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne (6-speed manual) is capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw X4 xDrive30d at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.56 kg/hp vs 6.87 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.93 seconds. The 1.25 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 xDrive30d G02 gagne (5,86 s vs 7,11 s).
Cayenne (6-speed manual) 958.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,11 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cayenne (6-speed manual) 958.1 : 304 hp, ratio 6,56 kg/hp. X4 xDrive30d G02 : 265 hp, ratio 6,87 kg/hp.
Cayenne (6-speed manual) 958.1 : 230 km/h. X4 xDrive30d G02 : 240 km/h.