Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo 958.1 gagne (4,45 s vs 7,07 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne Turbo 958.1 | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,45 s−2,62 s | 7,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,60 s−2,51 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,82 s−5,27 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 276 km/h+50 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,17 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,09 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne Turbo 958.1 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,24 s | 1,17 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,38 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,45 s | 7,07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,85 s | 10,12 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,55 s | 19,20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,30 s | 37,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,60 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,82 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed | 276 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp | Engine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 170 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Cayenne Turbo hits 100 km/h in 4.45 s versus 7.07 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the Cayenne Turbo leads by 2.62 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne Turbo is doing 149 km/h against 117 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 1.35 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne Turbo crosses the line in 12.59 s versus 15.11 s. The 2.52 s gap represents roughly 97 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne Turbo continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 205 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne Turbo finishes in 22.82 s versus 28.09 s, with a 5.27 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne Turbo is capped at 278 km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.17 kg/hp vs 9.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 2.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo 958.1 gagne (4,45 s vs 7,07 s).
Cayenne Turbo 958.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,45 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 520 hp, ratio 4,17 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp.
Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 276 km/h. Q7 SUV : 226 km/h.