Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 wins (6,29 s vs 10,64 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan 95B.2 | Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,29 s−4,35 s | 10,64 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s−3,31 s | 17,87 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s−5,15 s | 31,99 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 229 km/h+54 km/h | 175 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,69 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan 95B.2 | Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 2,93 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 4,42 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,41 s | 7,63 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,29 s | 10,64 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,77 s | 14,50 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,99 s | 27,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 30,23 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 17,87 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s | 31,99 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h | 175 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 859 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 143 hp | Inline-4 Atkinson cycle E-Tech (HR16) |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 528 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Multi-mode automatic (E-Tech) |
Off the line, the Macan hits 100 km/h in 6.29 s versus 10.64 s for the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145. At this point, the Macan leads by 4.35 s and sits roughly 43 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan is doing 125 km/h against 107 km/h for the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145. The gap is 2.51 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 17.87 s. The 3.31 s gap represents roughly 117 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 171 km/h versus 149 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan finishes in 26.84 s versus 31.99 s, with a 5.15 s lead.
The Macan features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan is capped at 229 km/h, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 at 175 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.59 kg/hp vs 10.69 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.93 seconds. The 4.35 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 wins (6,29 s vs 10,64 s).
Macan 95B.2 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,29 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan 95B.2: 245 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp. Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145: 143 hp, ratio 10,69 kg/hp.
Macan 95B.2: 229 km/h. Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145: 175 km/h.